Broker Outpost Mortgage Forums
Home | Recent Discussions | Register | Login | Mortgage Broker Directory | Mortgage Reference Library
 All Forums
 Mortgage Brokers
 Mortgage Brokers
 Search for: From Russia With Rice.
Next Page
Author Previous Topic  |  Next Topic
Page: of 3
assassin17

7838 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  6:49:59 PM
This has to be the most unbelievable quote I've seen all year. Condy Rice has balls of brass;

"This is not 1968 and the invasion of Czechoslovakia where Russia can threaten a neighbor, occupy a capital, overthrow a government and get away with it," Rice said just hours before leaving for France. "Things have changed."

I guess since Iraq wasn't our neighbor, it's ok on our end. She's right, this isn't 1968. Apparently, nothing's changed. Practice what you preach, idiot!
khoiey

2968 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  6:58:39 PM
I think it's two different situations. At the time we all thought Iraq had Weapon of mass destruction and we went in with coalition backings.

quote:
Originally posted by assassin17

This has to be the most unbelievable quote I've seen all year. Condy Rice has balls of brass;

"This is not 1968 and the invasion of Czechoslovakia where Russia can threaten a neighbor, occupy a capital, overthrow a government and get away with it," Rice said just hours before leaving for France. "Things have changed."

I guess since Iraq wasn't our neighbor, it's ok on our end. She's right, this isn't 1968. Apparently, nothing's changed. Practice what you preach, idiot!

assassin17

7838 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  7:00:53 PM
The UN did not back us, we created our own "coalition".

And we have not left, which makes it an "occupation".

Russia knew we would have no right to talk about this without being hypocrites and she just fed the fire with very badly-chosen words.
MisterVA

8643 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  7:02:48 PM
Read Yuri's post in another thread. I do not disagree with you.
Originate_This

388 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  7:35:23 PM
Remind me again did Russia bring Georgia to the UN security council for failure of 14 UN resolutions? Did Russia try to gain support from other countries for a year before invading? I can understand the desire of some to draw parallels with Iraq, but the situation is not the same.
TheFinancier

1439 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  7:51:03 PM
I agree it is not the same at all...

Rice is 100% right!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TheFinancier

1439 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  7:52:11 PM
This is Exactly what NATO was Created for... Its time to see what the Europeans are made of.
mykal5

6130 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  7:54:12 PM
quote:
Originally posted by assassin17

This has to be the most unbelievable quote I've seen all year. Condy Rice has balls of brass;

"This is not 1968 and the invasion of Czechoslovakia where Russia can threaten a neighbor, occupy a capital, overthrow a government and get away with it," Rice said just hours before leaving for France. "Things have changed."

I guess since Iraq wasn't our neighbor, it's ok on our end. She's right, this isn't 1968. Apparently, nothing's changed. Practice what you preach, idiot!



I actually lost all respect for her with that comment. And I really liked the lady. All this tough talk on the part of our leaders is some of the worst grandstanding I have seen. I mean really, what are we going to do? Boycott?
assassin17

7838 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  8:15:10 PM
I'm with you, Mykal. Lost all respect for her with that outlandish propaganda.

You other guys really aren't getting it... It doesn't matter if the situation is exactly the same, read her WORDS!

Her words are exactly what WE did and everyone else is going to insert the year 2002 in there and throw it right back in our face because it's completely hypocritical to justify it with the words she used.
homebroker@sbcgl

7370 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  8:30:00 PM

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/13/russia.georgia1

http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/28872

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4500160.ece


quote:
Originally posted by Originate_This

Remind me again did Russia bring Georgia to the UN security council for failure of 14 UN resolutions? Did Russia try to gain support from other countries for a year before invading? I can understand the desire of some to draw parallels with Iraq, but the situation is not the same.

ownerop

418 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  9:47:16 PM
It's not the same. Whether you agree with the Iraq war or not, you cannot draw the conclusion that they are the same unless you are so one sided and politically driven to the left that you cannot possibly look at something objectively. We did not go into Iraq to take the country over or to colonize or ethnically cleanse the country, which is what Russia wants to do.
homebroker@sbcgl

7370 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  9:49:58 PM
You might want to read this article to get a better picture of what happened!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4500160.ece

quote:
Originally posted by ownerop

It's not the same. Whether you agree with the Iraq war or not, you cannot draw the conclusion that they are the same unless you are so one sided and politically driven to the left that you cannot possibly look at something objectively. We did not go into Iraq to take the country over or to colonize or ethnically cleanse the country, which is what Russia wants to do.

This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
BigFire

2963 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  9:50:54 PM
exactly the same...you who do not think so are blind, open your eyes, smell the roses, get a breath of fresh air and see how the world sees things instead of your myopia.
assassin17

7838 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  10:04:41 PM
Nobody said it is the same situation. It is her own words that place it in the same category. This is as bad as McCain's comment that "in the 21st century, one nation doesn't invade other nations". Both quotes leave them wide open to being fried and humiliated.

Of course, Obama thinks it's safe to be out surfing in Hawaii during all of this, but that is just making him look even weaker on foreign policy. This is an event with huge implications, as both countries chose to escalate this mess during the "peaceful" Olympic period (Making the Olympic concept a farce), and he needs to roll up his sleeves and come out fighting on this issue too.

To ignore this is to give the indication that Putin can reform the USSR. To get involved in it, we become the hypocrites everyone has said we are. This is a VERY tough situation, because Georgia fired first, yet Russia knows that we have 3 different people giving 3 opinions on it and we're in nowhere-man territory.

We have two very different candidates and this is a situation that warrants Europe knowing NOW which way we are going to proceed. We can't proceed with a decision and have Obama back out on it 3 months from now, just because he wants to win the election. Likewise, we can't make stupid comments that allow it to be linked to our own situation.

Buffoons to the left of us, jokers to the right...
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
BigFire

2963 Posts

Posted - 08/13/2008 :  10:14:23 PM
hopefully Obama will comment and make strong recommendations. We will see.
TheFinancier

1439 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  12:34:26 AM
Hitler Said that they were invaded so thats why they started WWII... COme one man don't fall for that. The Georgians and Russians militaries have coexisted in those territores for years.

If Georgias president DID do it on purpose then it was nice to see him do it while bush was in office because if Obama was in office, I do not think Obama would have don much.

BUSH IS NOT SCARED OF RUSSIA OR KILLIN HUMAN LIFE, AND HE BELIEVES THAT THE USA IS THE MOST POWERFUL NATION IN THE WORLD AND IS NOT SCARED TO PROVE IT.

quote:
Originally posted by homebroker@sbcglobal.net

You might want to read this article to get a better picture of what happened!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4500160.ece

dc62

279 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  04:37:09 AM
Those who insist on pointing at the alleged WMD's to justify the invasion of Iraq show themselves to be not so well read. There is significant evidence that the Bush/Cheney cabal purposely "cooked the books" with regard to intelligence about the existence of WMD's. Their intent from the very beginning of their administration was to invade Iraq; they gained support at home by pushing the WMD issue when they knew it was not true. If you look at the administration rhetoric today, they don't talk about the WMD question anymore when talking about the war, they say how it's a better world without Saddam in it. That may be true, but that wasn't the rationale for the war.

As for the Georgian situation, the US is portraying this as a Russian invasion, when the facts don't bear that out. Georgia began the hostilities by attacking Russian Peacekeeping forces on the ground in South Ossetia, along with civilian areas. Independent sources indicate over 2000 civilian deaths were the result. Russia responded in the manner you would expect. There are a lot of distortions coming out about what's going on, so somebody is lying. Sadly, it appears that it is the Georgians and America that aren't being forthright. As an example, yesterday the president of Georgia, along with Bush, were claiming that Russian columns were moving on the capital while tanks and planes were shelling the city of Gori. Independent journalists traveling with the Russian column, along with journalists in Gori write that there is no shelling going on.

I believe this entire event was orchestrated by the US - it's unlikely that a close ally of the US would undertake such an action unilaterally. To what end this was undertaken is unclear at this point, but I'm sure it will make sense soon. If I was a betting man, I'd bet that this was done to divert Russian forces and attention to that area in advance of an attack on Iran. I'm sure the oil pipeline has something to do with this as well.
CoolMtgGuy

9067 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  04:49:36 AM
You must be Dick Chaney ...

No we did NOT "we all thought Iraq had Weapon of mass destruction". Only some arrogant people did.
How is this different? Maybe Russia thinks that Georgia has weapons of mass destruction too.


quote:
Originally posted by khoiey

I think it's two different situations. At the time we all thought Iraq had Weapon of mass destruction and we went in with coalition backings.

quote:
Originally posted by assassin17

This has to be the most unbelievable quote I've seen all year. Condy Rice has balls of brass;

"This is not 1968 and the invasion of Czechoslovakia where Russia can threaten a neighbor, occupy a capital, overthrow a government and get away with it," Rice said just hours before leaving for France. "Things have changed."

I guess since Iraq wasn't our neighbor, it's ok on our end. She's right, this isn't 1968. Apparently, nothing's changed. Practice what you preach, idiot!



mykal5

6130 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  08:06:18 AM
quote:
Originally posted by BigFire

hopefully Obama will comment and make strong recommendations. We will see.



Don't count on it. He's had the opportunity and up until now has failed to do so.
waymon2005

382 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  08:24:19 AM
what are the chances of WW III
KipW

933 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  08:32:10 AM
quote:
Originally posted by waymon2005

what are the chances of WW III




Chances are it would be the last world war.
hertz

1546 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  08:35:41 AM
quote:
Originally posted by BigFire

hopefully Obama will comment and make strong recommendations. We will see.



McCain gets his own thread blasting him for making comments about it but now you want to hear Obamas "strong recommendations". Hmmm. Obama's next "strong recommendation" on foreign affairs will be his first. My guess is that he will suggest change and blame it on Bush for ruining the way the rest of the world thinks about us.
TimmyZ1

909 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  08:54:05 AM
Let's either get a seperate forum going for OT stuff like this or keep it to mortgages. God people I come here for mortgages if I wanted to ***** about politcs there are a lot better forums to do this.
brad.easter

696 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  09:01:55 AM
I'm curious. What is the moral equivalency to Russia invading a sovreign country and the US situation in Iraq. We went with an international coalition, after going to the UN time and again, to enforce 14 UN resolutions. The Russians and every other intelligence agency in the world believed the WMD existed. I am puzzled why you people are always quick to defend the actions of tyrants and dictators and almost always feel the Bush Administration has lied and intend to kill our brave military on their whim.

I wish, just once that I saw a positive comment from the blame America first crowd. (Mykal5 this doesn't apply to you.)
homebroker@sbcgl

7370 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  09:22:04 AM
Russia invaded only after Georgia bombs Russian citizens, we could only hope had a country choose to bomb Americans our government would do the same thing.

quote:
Originally posted by brad.easter

I'm curious. What is the moral equivalency to Russia invading a sovreign country and the US situation in Iraq. We went with an international coalition, after going to the UN time and again, to enforce 14 UN resolutions. The Russians and every other intelligence agency in the world believed the WMD existed. I am puzzled why you people are always quick to defend the actions of tyrants and dictators and almost always feel the Bush Administration has lied and intend to kill our brave military on their whim.

I wish, just once that I saw a positive comment from the blame America first crowd. (Mykal5 this doesn't apply to you.)

just in kase

1512 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  09:29:21 AM
Georgian military killed Russian peace keepers and was attacking Russian citizens. Please get the facts straight. my advise- watch the BBC news then watch your local news. two differnet stories completely.


abed_converimax

651 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  09:49:49 AM
What are the chances of WWIII?

It has already begun, but it's a different type of war now, an information war. The days of fighting face to face man to man are over. Ask the hundreds of thousands of families being killed in the middle east and they'll tell you about WW3.

The U.S. government just overthrew an entire sovereign country and is now in Iran to do the same thing. 48% of the worlds oil is in the middle east, and now the US gov has installations covering the entire area(Halliburton is the name of the main Oil co. drilling out there, run by Cheney and Bush). But they want you to believe they are not there for oil, but to spread world peace and protect us.


The twin towers and building 7 on september 911 fell at free fall speed, 9.8 seconds watch the clips and time it, this is scientific proof that bombs were planted in all the buildings. There was NO resistance in a 130 floor + steel frame building?

If bombs were in the buildings, which is the only way there could have been no resistance at each floor, it must have taken a team weeks to set them up, therefor 911 was an inside job.

If fuel indeed was the cause of the first steel frame building in the history of the world to collapse, IF this WAS the case, the floors would have melted slowly and the towers would have bent over in collapse and tipped, not fallen one by one in a strait line downwards with no resistance.

7 of the 8 engineers who built the WTC's know this science because they build the structures, you can find all their testimonies online.

Unfortunetely the US Gov keeps information from their people by restraining what is televised, however the rest of the world is slowly learning the truth. That the US Gov needed to ensure 911 happened in order to convince the US people that they need to go attack other countries, this was in order to control their oil. And because a large catastrofic event was needed to change the patriot act and constitution.

Who has made hundreds of billions since 911, osama bin laden and his crew who are all still alive and well today by the way, or the bush administration who just gained total oil while simultatiously doubling their revenue by jacking prices?

Bin laden has been a CIA agent for over 20 years. His entire family was flown out of Virginia the day of 911. They served as the perfect patsy's who's paper passports somehow made it to ground zero on 911 even through everything else was destroyed.

Originate_This

388 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  09:57:51 AM
quote:
Originally posted by abed_converimax

What are the chances of WWIII?

It has already begun, but it's a different type of war now, an information war. The days of fighting face to face man to man are over. Ask the hundreds of thousands of families being killed in the middle east and they'll tell you about WW3.

The U.S. government just overthrew an entire sovereign country and is now in Iran to do the same thing. 48% of the worlds oil is in the middle east, and now the US gov has installations covering the entire area(Halliburton is the name of the main Oil co. drilling out there, run by Cheney and Bush). But they want you to believe they are not there for oil, but to spread world peace and protect us.


The twin towers and building 7 on september 911 fell at free fall speed, 9.8 seconds watch the clips and time it, this is scientific proof that bombs were planted in all the buildings. There was NO resistance in a 130 floor + steel frame building?

If bombs were in the buildings, which is the only way there could have been no resistance at each floor, it must have taken a team weeks to set them up, therefor 911 was an inside job.

If fuel indeed was the cause of the first steel frame building in the history of the world to collapse, IF this WAS the case, the floors would have melted slowly and the towers would have bent over in collapse and tipped, not fallen one by one in a strait line downwards with no resistance.

7 of the 8 engineers who built the WTC's know this science because they build the structures, you can find all their testimonies online.

Unfortunetely the US Gov keeps information from their people by restraining what is televised, however the rest of the world is slowly learning the truth. That the US Gov needed to ensure 911 happened in order to convince the US people that they need to go attack other countries to control their oil. And because a large catastrofic event was needed to change the patriot act and constitution.

Who has made hundreds of billions since 911, osama bin laden and his crew who are all still alive and well today by the way, or was it the bush administration?

Bin laden has been a CIA agent for over 20 years. His entire family was flown out of Virginia the day of 911. They served as the perfect patsy's.





Let me guess, you're a Ron Paul supporter.
abed_converimax

651 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  10:14:00 AM
I am a supporter of any polition who ask questions when confronted with scientific facts such as the law of gravity

I am a supporter of the hundreds of firefighters who reported bombs going off after the planes hit which forced them upwards and not downwards

I'm a supporter of the scientists who have found physical evidence of Thermite at ground zero indicating explosives



For those who think attacking your own country is far fetched- I just came back from visiting the Reichstag building in Germany, this was hitlers own parlimant building which he attacked himself to make his germans believe they needed to go to war. WW2 would have never happened without this event because the people wouldn't have let it happen. I know most americans wouldn't let their army overthrow another nation, unless ofcourse they tought they were under attack themselves.



financeone

2332 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  10:15:01 AM
I don't remember seeing any explosions below where the planes went into the towers. Censored would be your explanation?
Originate_This

388 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  10:17:15 AM
quote:
Originally posted by abed_converimax

I am a supporter of any polition who ask questions when confronted with scientific facts such as the law of gravity

I am a supporter of the hundreds of firefighters who reported bombs going off after the planes hit which forced them upwards and not downwards

I'm a supporter of the scientists who have found physical evidence of Thermite at ground zero indicating explosives



For those who think attacking your own country is far fetched- I just came back from visiting the Reichstag building in Germany, this was hitlers own parlimant building which he attacked himself to make his germans believe they needed to go to war. WW2 would have never happened without this event because the people wouldn't have let it happen. I know most americans wouldn't let their army overthrow another nation, unless ofcourse they tought they were under attack themselves.







Please don't have children
mojojojo_1

897 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  10:26:34 AM
we let pearl habor happen too. even the conspiracy theories repeat themselves.

"The Kremlin said the US must choose between partnership with Moscow, or with the Georgian leadership.

"At some time it will be necessary to choose between supporting this virtual project and [a] real partnership on questions which actually require collective action," said Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

The BBC's Caroline Wyatt, in Moscow, says the Kremlin's reaction suggests they have been bitterly stung by Mr Bush's comments.

But she says Mr Lavrov spoke in the knowledge that the US is unlikely to back up its verbal support for Georgia with any more concrete action. "

I know we are in a reccision and wars help, but i hope no more concrete action besides aid for civilians

abed_converimax

651 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  10:27:11 AM
The bombs were in the buildings attached to the core colums, this is why you can't see the bombs go off from the outside very clearly, however all you need to do is research the testimonies of all the firefighters at ground zero (who are constantly told to either shut up or lose their job) and they will tell you that the bombs were easily heard. Or listen to the testimonies of the people in the towers between the B1 and B2 levels who were blown upwards. Thermite proves the bombs were present, you can't deny this scientific evidnce.

In any controlled demolition you can't see the bombs because they are placed inside, all you see is the building fall at free fall speed.

If I do have children I will certainly ensure they learn the law of gravity in elementary school.

mojojojo_1

897 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  10:35:04 AM
simple physics when one of the largest engineering marvels go down.

here is the real scoop, history channel did a specail 2 months or more before 9-11. in the episode, they said that the towers could withstand a hit from a 747. WOW

brad.easter

696 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  10:35:08 AM
quote:
Originally posted by abed_converimax

The bombs were in the buildings attached to the core colums, this is why you can't see the bombs go off from the outside very clearly, however all you need to do is research the testimonies of all the firefighters at ground zero (who are constantly told to either shut up or lose their job) and they will tell you that the bombs were easily heard. Or listen to the testimonies of the people in the towers between the B1 and B2 levels who were blown upwards. Thermite proves the bombs were present, you can't deny this scientific evidnce.

In any controlled demolition you can't see the bombs because they are placed inside, all you see is the building fall at free fall speed.

If I do have children I will certainly ensure they learn the law of gravity in elementary school.





Adam, you actually believe that the political leadership in this country would purposely blow-up the WTC, Pentagon and crash a plane in PA? What is in the water in Winnipeg? How does your tin-foil hat fit over that massive intellect?
assassin17

7838 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:10:08 AM
quote:
Originally posted by TimmyZ1

Let's either get a seperate forum going for OT stuff like this or keep it to mortgages. God people I come here for mortgages if I wanted to ***** about politcs there are a lot better forums to do this.
Timothy,

1) You don't have to click on a topic when you see "Russia" in the title.

2) There is no separate area for this or I would have posted it there. That isn't my fault.

3) If you think that anyone is going to buy a house while nuclear warheads are being tossed through the air like tic-tacs, you are sadly mistaken.

As we have continuously stated, everything that happens in politics will have an effect upon this industry, which is closely tied to our economy and it's investors. Even the very threat of a war will lower all funds available for FNMA, FHA, FHLMC, GNMA, VA, etc etc etc.

While Iraq may not be a big enough deal to collapse everything, a possible war with a nuclear-armed Communist nation will mean a war with ALL Communist nations. That means China gets involved. Europe will also be involved. Do you happen to know who holds a sizable chunk of our economy in their hands?

Do you think China will continue to invest with us while we are fighting them? Do you think anyone in Europe is going to invest or pay debts if their country ceases to exist after being taken over?

This is not a small issue, not by any means, and your job depends on it's resolution. In a war, available money will be funneled towards products to win that war and not towards lending your clients money. The bigger the war, the bigger it's effect upon your job. And you don't actually NEED a war, you just need a threat of it to send investors scurrying away from the housing industry.

Don't be so short-sighted. You should start caring.
abed_converimax

651 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:17:49 AM
Fire has never brought down a steel frame building in history, besides WTC 1, 2, and 7 on sept 11. WTC wasn't even hit by a plane and yet it fell at free fall speed, the story is that it was hit by debris which made it collapse. They don't even mention WTC 7 in the 911 'ommision' report. Fox news reported wtc7 falling before it even fell, you can find this video online, this is because the gov let this information go to the media before it even happened.

In the video you will see the news reported saying WTC just feel, and in the background you can see it still standing, then falling a minute later- the reporter was a bit dumbfounded.

Fire does not bring down a building in that fasion, that quickly, fire takes time to burn through steel. Even if it did burn through a floor, the top would have tipped over not fallen directly downwards. And EVEN if it did fall downwards it would have encountered resistance at each floor, thus making the fall time more than 9.8 seconds. If I threw a bowling ball down from the top of the WTC when it started to fall, it would have hit the ground at the same time as the top of the building.

How did the best air defense system in the world let a giant airplane even close to the pentagon. They can see every plane flying in the entire united states and what path it's on.

The engineers who build the structures, and controlled demolition experts, these testimonies are all over the place. The information is out there just go out and grab it.

I appreciate those of you who are speaking about this very major issue in such a proffessional fasion. I wonder about those who are attacking my home city rater than my political views themselves.

Many americans are not even open to looking into the issue and questioning and I admire those who do at least question.
mojojojo_1

897 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:20:43 AM
abed_converimax

YOU HAVE TO SEE SOUTH PARKS 9-11 CONSPIRACY THERORY EPISODE, YOU WILL LAUGH
abed_converimax

651 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:22:37 AM
18 hijackers making NORAD stand down

Somehow hitting the pentagon

Now that is a conspiracy theory
brad.easter

696 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:24:41 AM
quote:
Originally posted by abed_converimax

Fire has never brought down a steel frame building in history, besides WTC 1, 2, and 7 on sept 11. WTC wasn't even hit by a plane and yet it fell at free fall speed, the story is that it was hit by debris which made it collapse. They don't even mention WTC 7 in the 911 'ommision' report. Fox news reported wtc7 falling before it even fell, you can find this video online, this is because the gov let this information go to the media before it even happened.

In the video you will see the news reported saying WTC just feel, and in the background you can see it still standing, then falling a minute later- the reporter was a bit dumbfounded.

Fire does not bring down a building in that fasion, that quickly, fire takes time to burn through steel. Even if it did burn through a floor, the top would have tipped over not fallen directly downwards. And EVEN if it did fall downwards it would have encountered resistance at each floor, thus making the fall time more than 9.8 seconds. If I threw a bowling ball down from the top of the WTC when it started to fall, it would have hit the ground at the same time as the top of the building.

How did the best air defense system in the world let a giant airplane even close to the pentagon. They can see every plane flying in the entire united states and what path it's on.

The engineers who build the structures, and controlled demolition experts, these testimonies are all over the place. The information is out there just go out and grab it.

I appreciate those of you who are speaking about this very major issue in such a proffessional fasion. I wonder about those who are attacking my home city rater than my political views themselves.

Many americans are not even open to looking into the issue and questioning and I admire those who do at least question.



Answer this question: How do suppose they make steel?
assassin17

7838 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:27:58 AM
Massive therapy is obviously needed.
abed_converimax

651 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:30:54 AM
I used to be this way as well, whenever I didn't have an answer to a questions, my answer would be a question itself
brad.easter

696 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:35:27 AM
No, I am serious about this. Do you know the process in which steel is manufactured? How about the process by which steel is recycled?

Discover the answer to these very simple questions. You may rethink your position, but I doubt it!
brandie

3260 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:53:48 AM
quote:
Originally posted by TimmyZ1

Let's either get a seperate forum going for OT stuff like this or keep it to mortgages. God people I come here for mortgages if I wanted to ***** about politcs there are a lot better forums to do this.



This in some ways does fall into mortgages that can effect us down the road.

If the fighting continues between Russia and Georgia, there may be some other countries that might back one or the other. Right now no one is because of the olympics happening. If lets say China joins in and then their economy starts struggling, the the world market will struggle.

Some of you can admit that the world market has been effected by the war in Iraq. Because of the loans that america owes to china. Who says that russia is going to ask the US or another country to borrow money to support this war.

It does not matter if it the dollar, yen, ruble or euro, if one or more loses value, then they all lose value.
dkendall1979

13278 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:54:18 AM
The towers didn't fall at free-fall speed. That's an unsound argument. From start to finish, the time it took for the top of #2 to hit the ground is well over what it would have been at free-fall speed. The conspiracy sites that depict it as such are just speeding up the frames.

A better argument is building #7's collapse. The way that thing went down is extremely suspect.

quote:
Originally posted by abed_converimax

I used to be this way as well, whenever I didn't have an answer to a questions, my answer would be a question itself

dkendall1979

13278 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  11:59:32 AM
Exactly! There was true motive behind that sucker going down. Billions of reasons!

quote:
Originally posted by darkstar

>>>>A better argument is building #7's collapse. The way that thing went down is extremely suspect.


They pulled the note, was ready to adjust, better to let it be a part of the "situation"...

mykal5

6130 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  12:04:10 PM
quote:
Originally posted by abed_converimax

I used to be this way as well, whenever I didn't have an answer to a questions, my answer would be a question itself



When you shut down for the evening check this out - http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/
Davemtg

572 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  12:04:37 PM
It is unpatriotic to joke about 9/11. Darkstar and dkendall need to have a nice vacation at Gitmo, that will give them something to laugh about.
dkendall1979

13278 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  12:06:51 PM
I've got 37 patriotic pellets in my body, what part of what I typed above would make you feel privileged enough to mention my name?

quote:
Originally posted by Davemtg

It is unpatriotic to joke about 9/11. Darkstar and dkendall need to have a nice vacation at Gitmo, that will give them something to laugh about.

hertz

1546 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  12:08:26 PM
quote:
Originally posted by abed_converimax

Fire has never brought down a steel frame building in history, besides WTC 1, 2, and 7 on sept 11. WTC wasn't even hit by a plane and yet it fell at free fall speed, the story is that it was hit by debris which made it collapse. They don't even mention WTC 7 in the 911 'ommision' report. Fox news reported wtc7 falling before it even fell, you can find this video online, this is because the gov let this information go to the media before it even happened.

In the video you will see the news reported saying WTC just feel, and in the background you can see it still standing, then falling a minute later- the reporter was a bit dumbfounded.

Fire does not bring down a building in that fasion, that quickly, fire takes time to burn through steel. Even if it did burn through a floor, the top would have tipped over not fallen directly downwards. And EVEN if it did fall downwards it would have encountered resistance at each floor, thus making the fall time more than 9.8 seconds. If I threw a bowling ball down from the top of the WTC when it started to fall, it would have hit the ground at the same time as the top of the building.

How did the best air defense system in the world let a giant airplane even close to the pentagon. They can see every plane flying in the entire united states and what path it's on.

The engineers who build the structures, and controlled demolition experts, these testimonies are all over the place. The information is out there just go out and grab it.

I appreciate those of you who are speaking about this very major issue in such a proffessional fasion. I wonder about those who are attacking my home city rater than my political views themselves.

Many americans are not even open to looking into the issue and questioning and I admire those who do at least question.



This was not just a fire. It was and intense, multi thousand gallon, jet fuel fire combined with an impact from a 65 ton jet that had rammed in to it at a couple of hundred miles per hour.


I can find testimony of little green people carrying people in to space to impregnate them too.

Just a little advice, if you are active on any other sites to sell leads, keep this type of conversation to yourself. Psycho talk may have cost you any credibility you may have had.

brad.easter

696 Posts

Posted - 08/14/2008 :  12:09:34 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Davemtg

It is unpatriotic to joke about 9/11. Darkstar and dkendall need to have a nice vacation at Gitmo, that will give them something to laugh about.



Lighten-up Francis! These guys have standing. Get a few more posts under your belt!
Page: of 3 Previous Topic  |  Next Topic  
Next Page
Advertising Information © 2007 Broker Outpost LLC, All Rights Reserved. Subscribe to the Forum Topics via RSS Go To Top Of Page
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions
This page was generated in 1.67 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000