Broker Outpost Mortgage Forums
Home | Recent Discussions | Register | Login | Mortgage Broker Directory | Mortgage Reference Library
 All Forums
 Mortgage Brokers
 Mortgage Brokers
 Search for: Question about ethics....
Next Page
Author Previous Topic  |  Next Topic
Page: of 2
rsd317

144 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  6:49:56 PM
I know everyone is struggling out there,but i wanted to pose a question.

A borrower, who is making about 54k a year wanted to buy a coop for 220k. He had about 120K to put down and a 45% dti and had pre approved for 110k mtg. After sitting at the kitchen with him and his family and hearing his life story, I saw that maybe buying wasnt the best option. It was an emotional conversation and after looking at his net income(which i generally enver do) it seemed like it would be really tight to support himself and 2 children. The conversation was one of doom and gllom which was partially my fauly. The long and short of it was that he decide that it was probably not the best idea to buy. Should I have just made the sale and called it a day? after talking to my colleagues most said it is not my decision to say if he can or can not afford. My emotions got tied up in the transaction and it was a lead from a realtor that is top producer. I hope I do not ruin this deal. I guess I know the answer to my question:he was qualified based on freddie/fannioe guidelines. Just want to hear everyones thougths.Thanks.
Managing Prime

2802 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  6:54:45 PM
We are not financial planners, but I'm willing to bet that that 120K would be best placed somewhere else for now.

I think you made a good call.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
darkstar

18289 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  6:59:03 PM
If by discussing their budget you could get them to see how it could be a struggle and they make the decision, that's fine...My opinion of their ability to afford it only means so much, if I think they can't afford, I can try and get them to see it, and if not, they went into to well informed and disclosed...I make sure not to impose my beliefs on someone, but I will try to get them to see it themselves!...

Did you show and discuss how a slightly cheaper one, or rearranging the bills with some of the down money could have worked out better for them or was there no other options?...
mantixmortgage

2717 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:02:30 PM
thats funny, so the realtor probly spent all this time trying to get them to buy, then you go to the dudes house and tell him not to buy and essentially kill the transaction

they're gonna send you a ton of business
cspatmon

2142 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:03:40 PM
I can truly identify with your statement when I was torn by such a decision. It brings to mind what many of my mentors said...."you can't possibly be all things to everyone". Do your part of the transaction and let others do theirs. Our main complaint that RE's way to often want to stick their little noses in the financing........ Believe it or not I complained once and you would never guess who ended up being penalized...... My righteousness didn't carry very well with the RE, Seller or the Borrower.
dtabar

768 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:15:53 PM
You shouldn't of advised the borrower to do anything. Especially since you were referred by the Realtor to qualify the borrower.

If they want to buy, let them buy. If they ask your opinion give your opinion and leave it at that. You don't know the WHOLE story and the Realtor could of known more to it than you. You never know.

I personally would be pissed if my Notary told my borrower they should not do the loan.
dtabar

768 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:17:59 PM
Just want to add, i'm not bashing you. You might of made the right call. It's just not your place to make it.
velecico

3991 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:20:21 PM


Wow , you might as well forget about any Realtor referrals in that town LOL
johnnyboy38109

3057 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:22:41 PM
quote:
Originally posted by mantixmortgage

thats funny, so the realtor probly spent all this time trying to get them to buy, then you go to the dudes house and tell him not to buy and essentially kill the transaction

they're gonna send you a ton of business



Realtors that expect LOs to push borrowers into loans they dont feel they can afford are not realtors I'd want anything to do with.

This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
TransNet

523 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:28:37 PM
First off I presume they were not under contract yet. If they were you opened yourself up to a lawsuit if they say that they are defaulting due to your advice, given that they qualify for the loan.

If they are not contractually obligated, you did the agent a favor. If the buyer wasn't committed (sold) then at some point in the process they would get cold feet and the transaction could get ugly. You can't talk someone out of buying a house that they are really committed to even if they can't afford it. (I've tried. lol) So I don't think you "killed" anything. A successful agent knows that if you put people first you make much more in commission in the long run than if you are only interested in the transaction in front of you. This is the basis of relationship selling as opposed to transactional selling.

One of my favorite sayings is "I can't tell you what you can afford, only what you qualify for." If they realized that they can't "afford" this house then you have done everyone in the transaction (including the seller) a favor. Better now than a week before closing.

Since they have money to work with I do agree with Darkstar's idea of rearranging their budget using some of the money that they were planning to use for down payment to see if the home can fit their income and expenses.
johnnyboy38109

3057 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:29:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by dtabar

You shouldn't of advised the borrower to do anything. Especially since you were referred by the Realtor to qualify the borrower.

If they want to buy, let them buy. If they ask your opinion give your opinion and leave it at that. You don't know the WHOLE story and the Realtor could of known more to it than you. You never know.

I personally would be pissed if my Notary told my borrower they should not do the loan.



This is part and parcel of the problem we have now.

The only concern the overwhelming majority of mortgage folk have is where they can sniff out their next paycheck. Thats why they are always having to sniff out their next paycheck. Thats a brand of thinking few understand, or have the guts to employ. And thats why so many have left or been laid off. Its the difference between being a legimate member of the business community and doing whats right and being just some guy who is always having to shake the bushes to make it. Most people in business cannot see past 5 inches in front of their faces, no one is willing to say to prospects "I dont think you can afford it", no one even at this stage where mortgage delinquencies are skyrocketing, is willing to refuse to contribute to the problem. The borrower, our industry, the economy, and the country are not well served by this shortsighted mentality, and we, on balance, have not learned a thing.

The poster did, very obviously, the right thing.
johnnyboy38109

3057 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:31:54 PM
quote:
Originally posted by TransNet

First off I presume they were not under contract yet. If they were you opened yourself up to a lawsuit if they say that they are defaulting due to your advice, given that they qualify for the loan.

If they are not contractually obligated, you did the agent a favor. If the buyer wasn't committed (sold) then at some point in the process they would get cold feet and the transaction could get ugly. You can't talk someone out of buying a house that they are really committed to even if they can't afford it. (I've tried. lol) So I don't think you "killed" anything. A successful agent knows that if you put people first you make much more in commission in the long run than if you are only interested in the transaction in front of you. This is the basis of relationship selling as opposed to transactional selling.

One of my favorite sayings is "I can't tell you what you can afford, only what you qualify for." If they realized that they can't "afford" this house then you have done everyone in the transaction (including the seller) a favor. Better now than a week before closing.

Since they have money to work with I do agree with Darkstar's idea of rearranging their budget using some of the money that they were planning to use for down payment to see if the home can fit their income and expenses.



the poster hasnt exposed himself to a thing...
velecico

3991 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:33:44 PM

Actually he COULD afford it , the OP had the OPINION he could not afford it and with that possibly blew income not only for himself and the realtor , but everyone down the line
dtabar

768 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:43:42 PM
quote:
Originally posted by johnnyboy38109

quote:
Originally posted by dtabar

You shouldn't of advised the borrower to do anything. Especially since you were referred by the Realtor to qualify the borrower.

If they want to buy, let them buy. If they ask your opinion give your opinion and leave it at that. You don't know the WHOLE story and the Realtor could of known more to it than you. You never know.

I personally would be pissed if my Notary told my borrower they should not do the loan.



This is part and parcel of the problem we have now.

The only concern the overwhelming majority of mortgage folk have is where they can sniff out their next paycheck. Thats why they are always having to sniff out their next paycheck. Thats a brand of thinking few understand, or have the guts to employ. And thats why so many have left or been laid off. Its the difference between being a legimate member of the business community and doing whats right and being just some guy who is always having to shake the bushes to make it. Most people in business cannot see past 5 inches in front of their faces, no one is willing to say to prospects "I dont think you can afford it", no one even at this stage where mortgage delinquencies are skyrocketing, is willing to refuse to contribute to the problem. The borrower, our industry, the economy, and the country are not well served by this shortsighted mentality, and we, on balance, have not learned a thing.

The poster did, very obviously, the right thing.




Oh please. "The poster did the right thing" How do you know? Do you know the borrower taking the app? Everyone is "so righteous". I don't understand how you can make such broad assumptions. How do you know I never turned down any loan because because it doesn't make sense? I give the options and if the client chooses to proceed then it's up to them. I'm not their father or mother. Are you also going to give them advice on their love life too?

My job is to make sure they can qualify. I'll give my opinion, but I'll never tell them yer or no.
mrwiizrd

32 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:46:20 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

if you honestly think that someone who can put that much down can't pay a mortgage payment then you need to find yourself another profession.

you should've made the sale!

next time you have a conscience experience maybe you should think about selling your car & walking first. You're polluting our atmosphere with the carbon monoxide.



this makes me want to puke, did you even think before you wrote this?
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
TransNet

523 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:52:25 PM
John,

Do you know for certain that the borrower had not obligated themselves to a contract? My point was that originators should be careful in encouraging people to not fullfill their legal obligations. Other than that I agree totally with your comments that the poster did the right thing and that in the long run looking out for the public's best interest is in everyone's best interest.

Nick,

It wasn't the OP that decided that the borrower couldn't afford to buy the property, it was the buyer that made that decision. Better sooner than later. You can't lose what you didn't have.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
CoralSnake

10880 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:52:49 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

if you honestly think that someone who can put that much down can't pay a mortgage payment then you need to find yourself another profession.

you should've made the sale!

next time you have a conscience experience maybe you should think about selling your car & walking first. You're polluting our atmosphere with the carbon monoxide.

IM not sure if you are serious about this one??
mrwiizrd

32 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:54:21 PM
quote:
Originally posted by CoralSnake

quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

if you honestly think that someone who can put that much down can't pay a mortgage payment then you need to find yourself another profession.

you should've made the sale!

next time you have a conscience experience maybe you should think about selling your car & walking first. You're polluting our atmosphere with the carbon monoxide.

IM not sure if you are serious about this one??



I hope he isn't...
johnnyboy38109

3057 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  7:54:39 PM
quote:
Originally posted by TransNet

John,

Do you know for certain that the borrower had not obligated themselves to a contract? My point was that originators should be careful in encouraging people to not fullfill their legal obligations. Other than that I agree totally with your comments that the poster did the right thing and that in the long run looking out for the public's best interest is in everyone's best interest.

Nick,

It wasn't the OP that decided that the borrower couldn't afford to buy the proerty, it was the buyer that made that decision. Better sooner than later. You can't lose what you didn't have.



Point out to me one instance when a loan originator got sued because they simply stated to a borrower a concern about repayment ability.

One.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
TransNet

523 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  8:04:18 PM
John,

I can't. It is highly unlikely that an originator would be sued for tortuous interference with a contract in this circumstance. And I certainly don't mind talking with a customer about their ability or inability to repay a loan. But I don't encourage anyone to default on their legal obligations either.
cspatmon

2142 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  8:11:48 PM
Transnet, he probably misunderstood in what context you were referring. I'll expand that the borrower's legal obligation a bottom line PA.
rsd317

144 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  8:21:06 PM
OK so its 50/50...from all this i got a good education...just an fyi, client was simply being pre approved and was not in cotract, possibly making an offer below ask (coops there is not too much wiggle room). next time i am face withd a situation similar to this one, i am simply going to say what trans stated "I can't tell you what you can afford, only what you qualify for." and leave the ball in the borrowers court.

as for the realtor relationship, i am little worried, its a cath 22 but she is a true professional and i am sure she would be understanding...another fyi, this person walked into one of her open houses..i will keep everyone updated...thanks
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
darkstar

18289 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  8:50:15 PM
>>>>a cath 22 but she is a true professional and i am sure she would be understanding

I've found that many true professional understand everything as long as it's going their way, I wouldn't assume she understands anything other than her own wants...JMHO...
johnnyboy38109

3057 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  8:51:35 PM
quote:
Originally posted by TransNet

John,

I can't. It is highly unlikely that an originator would be sued for tortuous interference with a contract in this circumstance. And I certainly don't mind talking with a customer about their ability or inability to repay a loan. But I don't encourage anyone to default on their legal obligations either.




..........its "tortious".........

leave the law and legal sounding postings to those qualified to dispense such advice. You arent and these type replies are dangerous.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
TransNet

523 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  9:06:54 PM
You are right John as usual.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
TransNet

523 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  9:17:30 PM
quote:
Originally posted by cspatmon

Transnet, he probably misunderstood in what context you were referring. I'll expand that the borrower's legal obligation a bottom line PA.



Cecilia,
I think what was misunderstood was my hyperbole. If I could say it all over again I think I would say it this way: the time to discuss a borrower's ability to afford a payment is before they enter into a purchase agreement, not after.

Randy,
I would be honest with the agent. It sounds like the buyer is not sure that they can afford this property regardless of what they qualify for. As John said, "Realtors that expect LOs to push borrowers into loans they dont feel they can afford are not realtors I'd want anything to do with."

I also think that you give yourself too much credit. Do you really think you convinced these people that they can't afford this house? If they had told you, "This is our dream house, we are so excited, thank you so much for helping us with the financing, we have been dreaming for this soooo long" do you think you could have talked them out of it? These people have reservations for a reason. It sounds like after you listened to their reservations they were not unreasonable ones. That doesn't mean that you can't give support and reassurance to borrowers that are having a case of cold feet. Most buyers go through this. But a borrower that truly has doubts about affording the home they are thinking of buying need someone that can empathize with them, not someone that is tryng to shove a loan down their throat.

rsd317

144 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  9:27:05 PM
quote:

Randy,
I would be honest with the agent. It sounds like the buyer is not sure that they can afford this property regardless of what they qualify for. As John said, "Realtors that expect LOs to push borrowers into loans they dont feel they can afford are not realtors I'd want anything to do with."

I also think that you give yourself too much credit. Do you [i]really
think you convinced these people that they can't afford this house? If they had told you, "This is our dream house, we are so excited, thank you so much for helping us with the financing, we have been dreaming for this soooo long" do you think you could have talked them out of it? These people have reservations for a reason. It sounds like after you listened to their reservations they were not unreasonable ones. That doesn't mean that you can't give support and reassurance to borrowers that are having a case of cold feet. Most buyers go through this. But a borrower that truly has doubts about affording the home they are thinking of buying need someone that can empathize with them, not someone that is tryng to shove a loan down their throat.





I am the man! kidding...like you said if someone really wants a house they can qualify for nothing will stop them from "making it work"...it was just a very sad story i was being told and i did not want to "assist" them into making an even sader story...i like to deal with reality and reality is that the client has a job with no upward mobility 2 tweens and limited reserves with gas at 4.37/gallon...something didnt feel right and again moving forward you have to seperate your emotions from this business and help the client make an informed and educated decision.
slants

4274 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  9:51:17 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

your story doesnt add up

54k per year is 4500 per month
110k mortgage at 6.25% is 677.29 with tax/ins...probably 1000 or less
That would make his front end at 22%.

You can tell him to use some of the 110k to pay things off?

What is missing from this equation?


45% backend on $4,500 gross = $2,025. Assuming take home pay of $3,375, it leaves him $1,350/mo. to pay utilities, buy gas and put food on the table. I can see why he would have reservations.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
TransNet

523 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  9:55:07 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

I AM SERIOUS. You guys are self righteous to even say anything different.

I haven't written any subprime mortgage or exotic mortgages.
I dont write loans that have an interest higher than 7%.
I give most of my borrowers PAR RATE with 1 point in the front.
Most of you guys won't even do the loan if you weren't making 3 points!

Hypocrites!

I'm not the Underwriter, and neither are YOU.

Most of you would charge 3-4 points JUST BECAUSE THE BORROWER CAN AFFORD IT.

IF ANYONE HERE THINKS THEY'RE RIGHTEOUS THEN SEND YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA OR ACORN.
NACA has NO CLOSING COSTS...NO PMI....and today's rate is 5.625% for a 30yr fixed!

DO THE RIGHT THINK FOLKS...AND START SENDING YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA.

BTW mrwiizrd...your profile picture makes me puke.



Robert,

The best way to make a sale is to understand the borrower's wants, needs, and concerns. It makes good business sense to listen to a borrower and not try to "sell" them a loan. If the borrower trusts you and you can make a case for them buying a home, a loan, or anything else, then they will buy. You're happy, they're happy, and not only do you make a sale, but you get referrals. It's good business.

I wasn't privy to the OP's conversation with this borrower, but I would guess that it wasn't the originator that had the reservations as much as the borrower. If the borrower had gotten the slightest impression that the originator was more interested in making the sale than listening to their concerns then a sale would have been lost. It is up to the originator to honestly address the borrower's concerns. It may be that his borrower can find a way to afford this home, but they will only buy from the person that can present that option in a way that the borrower can trust. I have a feeling that when this borrower is ready to buy, Randy will be getting their business. Why? Because he is truly interested in the buyer's well-being and that sincerity in the face of losing a "top producing" agent comes through.

I don't call that hypocrisy, I call that good business.
aprilwms

15 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2008 :  11:19:15 PM
quote:
Originally posted by rsd317

I know everyone is struggling out there,but i wanted to pose a question.

A borrower, who is making about 54k a year wanted to buy a coop for 220k. He had about 120K to put down and a 45% dti and had pre approved for 110k mtg. After sitting at the kitchen with him and his family and hearing his life story, I saw that maybe buying wasnt the best option. It was an emotional conversation and after looking at his net income(which i generally enver do) it seemed like it would be really tight to support himself and 2 children. The conversation was one of doom and gllom which was partially my fauly. The long and short of it was that he decide that it was probably not the best idea to buy. Should I have just made the sale and called it a day? after talking to my colleagues most said it is not my decision to say if he can or can not afford. My emotions got tied up in the transaction and it was a lead from a realtor that is top producer. I hope I do not ruin this deal. I guess I know the answer to my question:he was qualified based on freddie/fannioe guidelines. Just want to hear everyones thougths.Thanks.



Ultimately, the borrower is going to have to decide his own path. If he buys now and plans to stay in his new home for 10+ years, he can ride through the cycle. Maybe quality of life is more important to him. But if there is a chance that he might move in 5 years, I'd say hold off, the bottom is yet to come.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
ML

3019 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  03:36:52 AM
Where else you gonna live on LI for under $1000 a month?

The only place cheaper than that co-op is their mothers basement!

This is a simple rent vs buy decision. I'm sure you factored into your calculations the tax benefits of buy vs rent? $1000/mo rent is $12,000 a year down the crapper. $1000/mo mortgage payment is $11,000 TAX DEDUCTION. Net COST to him is only $8,000 OR $700/MO. You can't rent a parking space for that much on LI.

You're not pimping for some wh*re Realtor at the TOP of the market. It don't get no cheaper in metro NYC then right now.

Rent only goes up, no equity stake! Fixed rate mortgage payments stay the same, you gain when property appreciates.

Your job:

GET THEM TO SIGN ON THE LINE WHICH IS DOTTED!
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
ML

3019 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  04:11:41 AM
I just checked houses for sale in Plainview, NY in Long Island Newsday, the paper of record for that part of Metro NYC. The cheapest 3/1 house 1150 sq. ft., no basement no garage is listed for $355k. The cheapest Condo 2/2 is $359k.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
darkstar

18289 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  04:21:06 AM
RSD, be glad you're not as hard up as some of these desperate LOs that "need" to make every deal or starve because they can't admit they can't make it now that skills are needed...In that position they can't possibly consider what's best for the borrower, well, they may consider it, but they're only thinking about what pays them...Just because it can be a deal, doesn't mean it should be, more people with your attitude is what's missing in our industry...
benjamin

2278 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  04:36:11 AM
The tax benefits and credits for chidren definately puts it in favor of buying. Lower down payment, either paying off other debt or even having a cushion makes this a deal one that should have consumated.

Historical ratios were 28/36. I have too assume they have a credit card or two, or car payment which could be reduced.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
ML

3019 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  04:52:30 AM
quote:
Originally posted by benjamin

The tax benefits and credits for chidren definately puts it in favor of buying. Lower down payment, either paying off other debt or even having a cushion makes this a deal one that should have consumated.

Historical ratios were 28/36. I have too assume they have a credit card or two, or car payment which could be reduced.



Exactly, Realtors always come to us and say: here's the deal, we'll put this much down and then do this and do that... To which I invariably wind up saying: That's all well and good, but it won't pass underwriting. Here is how we will have to structure the loan if you want it to close.

Same with borrowers, they have their own preconceived notions of how they want the transaction to proceed. This is where the Loan Consultant comes in. You might suggest putting "only" $100k down, and paying off $10-20k in CC debt. Or paying off one car loan? Anything to reduce the back ratio so the people don't starve!
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
CoralSnake

10880 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:05:29 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

I AM SERIOUS. You guys are self righteous to even say anything different.

I haven't written any subprime mortgage or exotic mortgages.
I dont write loans that have an interest higher than 7%.
I give most of my borrowers PAR RATE with 1 point in the front.
Most of you guys won't even do the loan if you weren't making 3 points!

Hypocrites!

I'm not the Underwriter, and neither are YOU.

Most of you would charge 3-4 points JUST BECAUSE THE BORROWER CAN AFFORD IT.

IF ANYONE HERE THINKS THEY'RE RIGHTEOUS THEN SEND YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA OR ACORN.
NACA has NO CLOSING COSTS...NO PMI....and today's rate is 5.625% for a 30yr fixed!

DO THE RIGHT THINK FOLKS...AND START SENDING YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA.

BTW mrwiizrd...your profile picture makes me puke.

Most of my borrower refuse to pay anything on the front and rather me make it on the back end. Sometimes are higher than 7% (especially with all Fannies hits these days). Nothing wrong with that.
rsd317

144 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:21:19 AM
here is some missing info....the borrower has a car lease of 328 and a 225 installment loan for jewlery (total amount due is close to 5k)...we were going to use he 150k in the following manner....120k dp, 5k pay off jewelers, 6k for flip tax of coop, another 5-6k for closing and the rest was for reserves...he needed funriture as well and that is why i was a little hesitant to make the loan leaving him limited reserves, no upward mobility and credit cards that could look very attractive...i know i know i cant manage his debt and pay his bills and play god...anyway if he wants to move forward i will do the loan..
mrwiizrd

32 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:23:08 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

I AM SERIOUS. You guys are self righteous to even say anything different.

I haven't written any subprime mortgage or exotic mortgages.
I dont write loans that have an interest higher than 7%.
I give most of my borrowers PAR RATE with 1 point in the front.
Most of you guys won't even do the loan if you weren't making 3 points!

Hypocrites!

I'm not the Underwriter, and neither are YOU.

Most of you would charge 3-4 points JUST BECAUSE THE BORROWER CAN AFFORD IT.

IF ANYONE HERE THINKS THEY'RE RIGHTEOUS THEN SEND YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA OR ACORN.
NACA has NO CLOSING COSTS...NO PMI....and today's rate is 5.625% for a 30yr fixed!

DO THE RIGHT THINK FOLKS...AND START SENDING YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA.

BTW mrwiizrd...your profile picture makes me puke.



Wow, quite the zinger there with that last line, the picture is a bit, I would think even a child could figure that out. I'm going to bow out, but if I were you I would take a second to think about what you are writing in this thread, your comments make me ashamed to be in the real estate industry.
goodguy1

1654 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:29:16 AM
not knowing all of the details of the transaction (job history, reserves, etc.), maybe he could have been approved for a bit more and put less down; which could have resulted in him being more satisfied by not depleting so much of his cash.

I think a person's ethics have to be strong. You could have handled this better and still got the deal done. More legwork on your part with finding out more about your client and getting to know him would have helped tremendously.

I don't know if you did the right thing because there are too many questions at this point.
What if he just wwanted you to re-assure him because he is one who typically experiences "buyers remorse"

Get to know your client better.

my .02
rsd317

144 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:40:42 AM
quote:
Originally posted by goodguy1

not knowing all of the details of the transaction (job history, reserves, etc.), maybe he could have been approved for a bit more and put less down; which could have resulted in him being more satisfied by not depleting so much of his cash.

I think a person's ethics have to be strong. You could have handled this better and still got the deal done. More legwork on your part with finding out more about your client and getting to know him would have helped tremendously.

I don't know if you did the right thing because there are too many questions at this point.
What if he just wwanted you to re-assure him because he is one who typically experiences "buyers remorse"

Get to know your client better.

my .02



it has never been a question of can he qualify, more about how the payment would fit his situation...one income no upward mobility, maintence could possible go up from 750...he really wants in to this coop...a bigger mortgage would not fly with coop because he just qualifies for that too...and after looking at his possible net income per month with car insurance, food and gas there was not that much room...again the deal is still out there, just had an emotional 1st meeting...
CoolMtgGuy

3704 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:53:01 AM
You overstepped your bounds. If you could not do the loan, you should have simply informed the borrower as such. Otherwise, get the loan done and keep you rpersonal opinions to yourself. You are not a financial advisor or planner nor were you asked for your opinion. You are simply an originator.

Furthermore, you have a responsibility to your referral partner and you failed there.
Remember that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. You may have done the right thing for you ... but not necessarily for the borrower or your referral partner.
This User is a Premium Member, Click Here to Learn More!
CoralSnake

10880 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:53:44 AM
I think you may be showing what is commonly referred to as 'Coop Remorse'.

This is the medical terminology used to describe when an LO has worked on a few coop mortgage loans and has not been compensated properly for his time and all the extra work that goes into these transactions. It is compounded by the fact that these loan sizes are typically smaller than their non-coop counterparts.

example: "When the LO received a referral for a $100,000 Coop loan, he showed a bit of Coop Remorse and talked the borrowers out of the deal".
rsd317

144 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  07:55:36 AM
quote:
Originally posted by CoolMtgGuy

You overstepped your bounds. If you could not do the loan, you should have simply informed the borrower as such. Otherwise, get the loan done and keep you rpersonal opinions to yourself. You are not a financial advisor or planner nor were you asked for your opinion. You are simply an originator.

Furthermore, you have a responsibility to your referral partner and you failed there.
Remember that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. You may have done the right thing for you ... but not necessarily for the borrower or your referral partner.



agreed!!!!!

i have learned my lesson for the 10th time during this post.....its getting redundant....i will stop posting after this....his offer wouldnt stick any how and if he was to put more money down it would really limit his reserves and a bigger mortgage he would not meet coops guidelines....im out
CoolMtgGuy

3704 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  08:01:19 AM
Since when is the average originator qualified to determine "what is best for the borrower". That is an arrogrant and presumptious mindset for an originator to have. I would laugh at any originator who would be presumptious and egotistical enough to tell me what they think is best for me as a borrower. Originators are not qualified to make that call and it is not their job responsibility either. Which originator ever tells their client "Mr. borrower, in my infinite wisdom I know what what is in your best interest and I will tell you whether or not you shoud do this transaction".

Stick to generating leads. Leave the originations to others.

quote:
Originally posted by darkstar

RSD, be glad you're not as hard up as some of these desperate LOs that "need" to make every deal or starve because they can't admit they can't make it now that skills are needed...In that position they can't possibly consider what's best for the borrower, well, they may consider it, but they're only thinking about what pays them...Just because it can be a deal, doesn't mean it should be, more people with your attitude is what's missing in our industry...

rsd317

144 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  08:32:59 AM
quote:
Originally posted by CoolMtgGuy

Since when is the average originator qualified to determine "what is best for the borrower". That is an arrogrant and presumptious mindset for an originator to have. I would laugh at any originator who would be presumptious and egotistical enough to tell me what they think is best for me as a borrower. Originators are not qualified to make that call and it is not their job responsibility either. Which originator ever tells their client "Mr. borrower, in my infinite wisdom I know what what is in your best interest and I will tell you whether or not you shoud do this transaction".

Stick to generating leads. Leave the originations to others.

quote:
Originally posted by darkstar

RSD, be glad you're not as hard up as some of these desperate LOs that "need" to make every deal or starve because they can't admit they can't make it now that skills are needed...In that position they can't possibly consider what's best for the borrower, well, they may consider it, but they're only thinking about what pays them...Just because it can be a deal, doesn't mean it should be, more people with your attitude is what's missing in our industry...





dude you have to chill out, your post seems like you are fuming over there...this is what the BO community is about---to help people in the mortgage biz...we are all very opinionated but there is no reason to be condescending and put people down...sometimes people are just happy to be approved and think narrowly...you do it your way and i will do it my way..i learned my lesson and the lesson is stick to what you do--which is ORIGINATE LOANS and be a resource for people...not just to sell people what they want otherwise i am just a rate
mrwiizrd

32 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  08:35:01 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

I assume you never written a stated loan? Nope, never have, not one.

I'm also assuming that you send your borrowers to NACA. My borrower's are corporations, so it's not an option.

Why dont you find yourself another job because you're clearly ripping ppl off with your closing costs, PMI, and higher interest rate. Oh right, putting a consumer in a loan they QUALIFY for but can't AFFORD isn't ripping people off, it's doing your job. Gotcha. And people wonder why we're in the middle of a housing crisis.

When ppl ask you about NACA or Bofa's program....do you tell them they have a better program or do you lie through your teeth to get the deal?

Kind of double standard I see...


Not really at all
quote:
Originally posted by mrwiizrd

quote:
Originally posted by Banker0679

I AM SERIOUS. You guys are self righteous to even say anything different.

I haven't written any subprime mortgage or exotic mortgages.
I dont write loans that have an interest higher than 7%.
I give most of my borrowers PAR RATE with 1 point in the front.
Most of you guys won't even do the loan if you weren't making 3 points!

Hypocrites!

I'm not the Underwriter, and neither are YOU.

Most of you would charge 3-4 points JUST BECAUSE THE BORROWER CAN AFFORD IT.

IF ANYONE HERE THINKS THEY'RE RIGHTEOUS THEN SEND YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA OR ACORN.
NACA has NO CLOSING COSTS...NO PMI....and today's rate is 5.625% for a 30yr fixed!

DO THE RIGHT THINK FOLKS...AND START SENDING YOUR BORROWERS TO NACA.

BTW mrwiizrd...your profile picture makes me puke.



Wow, quite the zinger there with that last line, the picture is a bit, I would think even a child could figure that out. I'm going to bow out, but if I were you I would take a second to think about what you are writing in this thread, your comments make me ashamed to be in the real estate industry.



mantixmortgage

2717 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2008 :  08:40:50 AM
i can't believe i read all these responses
ppulatie